Your Quality Management Data Template

Oracle Quality Management
Your Quality Management Data Template

Your Quality Management Data Template

This template provides a comprehensive guide to the essential data attributes and process activities needed for effective Quality Management analysis. It also includes practical guidance on how to extract this critical information from your Oracle Quality Management system. Use this resource to ensure you capture all necessary data for deep insights and process optimization.
  • Recommended attributes to collect
  • Key activities to track
  • Extraction guidance
New to event logs? Learn how to create a process mining event log.

Quality Management Attributes

These are the recommended data fields and contextual information to include in your event log for comprehensive quality management analysis and insight.
3 Required 8 Recommended 10 Optional
Name Description
Activity Name
ActivityName
The name of the specific task or step that occurred within the quality management process.
Description

This attribute describes a single event or action taken as part of managing a quality event. The sequence of these activities, ordered by their timestamps, forms the process flow for each case.

Analyzing the Activity Name is central to process mining. It allows for the discovery of the actual process model, comparison against a desired model for conformance checking, and identification of bottlenecks or rework loops between specific activities. For example, it helps measure the time spent between 'Investigation Initiated' and 'Root Cause Analysis Performed'.

Why it matters

This attribute is fundamental for mapping the process flow, identifying deviations, and understanding how work is actually performed.

Where to get

This information is typically derived from event logs, status change records, or action history tables within the Oracle Quality Management module.

Examples
Quality Issue IdentifiedInvestigation InitiatedCorrective Action Plan ApprovedFinal Review and Closure
Event Start Time
EventStartTime
The timestamp indicating when an activity or event began.
Description

This attribute provides the precise date and time that a specific process step started. It is the primary temporal element used to order events chronologically and build the process sequence for each quality event case.

In analysis, the Event Start Time is crucial for calculating cycle times, durations, and waiting times between activities. It enables the identification of bottlenecks by highlighting long delays between consecutive steps and is used to track performance against time-based KPIs, such as Root Cause Analysis Lead Time.

Why it matters

This timestamp is the backbone of the process analysis, enabling all time-based calculations and the correct ordering of activities.

Where to get

This timestamp is typically found in transaction logs or history tables associated with quality actions and collection plans, often named CREATION_DATE or similar.

Examples
2023-04-15T09:00:12Z2023-04-16T11:30:00Z2023-05-01T14:22:45Z
Quality Event
QualityEventId
The unique identifier for a single quality event, such as a non-conformance, complaint, or deviation.
Description

The Quality Event ID serves as the primary case identifier, grouping all related activities from initial reporting to final closure. Each quality incident is assigned a unique ID, creating a complete historical record of the investigation and resolution process.

In process mining analysis, this attribute is fundamental for reconstructing the end-to-end journey of each quality event. It allows for the calculation of overall cycle times, the identification of process variants, and the analysis of how different types of events are handled. By linking every activity log to a specific Quality Event ID, analysts can visualize the complete process flow and identify systemic bottlenecks or compliance issues.

Why it matters

This ID is essential as it defines the scope of a single case, enabling accurate tracking of quality events and calculation of end-to-end performance metrics.

Where to get

This is typically the primary key in the main quality event or collection plan tables within Oracle Quality Management, such as QA_RESULTS.

Examples
NC-2023-00123CAPA-45892QE-500-A
Assigned User
AssignedUser
The individual user assigned to perform an activity or own the quality event.
Description

This attribute specifies the person responsible for a particular task or for the overall management of the quality event. It provides a more granular level of detail than the responsible department.

Analyzing by user helps in understanding individual workloads, identifying training needs, and recognizing top performers. It can also reveal patterns such as work being consistently reassigned or tasks stalling with specific individuals. This level of detail is useful for performance management and detailed resource optimization.

Why it matters

It allows for granular analysis of individual workload and performance, helping to identify resource constraints or training opportunities.

Where to get

Consult Oracle Quality Management documentation. User assignment information is typically stored in action or workflow tables associated with the quality event.

Examples
j.smitha.jonesr.williams
Current Status
CurrentStatus
The current status of the quality event case.
Description

This attribute indicates the present state of the quality event in its lifecycle, such as 'Open', 'Under Investigation', 'Pending Approval', or 'Closed'. It provides a snapshot of where the case is in the process at the time of data extraction.

This is a critical attribute for operational monitoring, directly supporting the 'Open Quality Events & Status Overview' dashboard. It allows managers to quickly see the current pipeline of quality issues and prioritize resources. In process mining, filtering by the final status helps in analyzing the outcomes of different process paths.

Why it matters

It provides a real-time view of the quality event pipeline, enabling effective operational management and prioritization of active cases.

Where to get

This information is usually available in the main header table for quality events, reflecting the last known state of the event.

Examples
OpenIn ProgressAwaiting ApprovalClosed
Event End Time
EventEndTime
The timestamp indicating when an activity or event was completed.
Description

The Event End Time marks the completion of a specific activity. When paired with the Event Start Time, it defines the processing time for that activity. For some systems, an activity may be instantaneous, in which case the start and end times are the same.

This attribute is essential for detailed duration analysis. It allows analysts to differentiate between active processing time (the duration between start and end time) and waiting time (the duration between the end of one activity and the start of the next). This is key for identifying where resources are actively engaged and where handoffs cause delays.

Why it matters

It enables the precise calculation of activity processing times, which helps pinpoint inefficient tasks versus long waiting periods.

Where to get

This may be available in the same transaction or history tables as the start time, sometimes as a LAST_UPDATE_DATE or a specific completion timestamp. It might also be inferred from the start time of the subsequent event.

Examples
2023-04-15T09:15:30Z2023-04-16T12:00:00Z2023-05-02T10:00:00Z
Processing Time
ProcessingTime
The duration of time spent actively working on an activity.
Description

Processing Time is the duration calculated between the Event Start Time and the Event End Time for a single activity. It represents the active work time, as opposed to waiting time between activities.

This metric is a core component of detailed performance analysis. By summing the processing times of all activities in a case, one can understand the total touch time. Comparing total touch time to the overall case cycle time reveals how much of the process is value-added work versus idle waiting time, a key insight for Lean and Six Sigma improvement efforts.

Why it matters

It isolates active work time from idle waiting time, helping to identify which specific tasks are time-consuming.

Where to get

This metric is calculated from the EventStartTime and EventEndTime attributes during data transformation.

Examples
PT15M30SPT2HP1D
Responsible Department
ResponsibleDepartment
The department or functional area responsible for the quality event or the current activity.
Description

This attribute identifies the team or department assigned to handle the quality event. This could be Quality Assurance, Engineering, Production, or another group, and it may change as the event progresses through its lifecycle.

In process mining, analyzing by Responsible Department is key to understanding workload distribution, identifying departmental bottlenecks, and comparing performance across different teams. It supports the 'Quality Event Resource Allocation' dashboard by showing which departments are involved in which types of activities, helping to optimize resource management.

Why it matters

It enables analysis of workload, performance, and bottlenecks by department, which is crucial for resource planning and organizational improvement.

Where to get

Consult Oracle Quality Management documentation. This may be stored in tables related to quality actions or assignments, linked to the quality event.

Examples
Quality EngineeringManufacturing OperationsSupplier QualityDesign Engineering
Root Cause Category
RootCauseCategory
The classification of the determined root cause of the quality issue.
Description

After a root cause analysis is performed, the findings are often categorized into predefined groups like 'Equipment Failure', 'Human Error', or 'Design Flaw'. This attribute stores that final classification.

Analyzing the process by Root Cause Category is extremely powerful. It helps shift the focus from fixing individual symptoms to addressing the underlying systemic problems. For example, a high number of events with a 'Training Issue' root cause can inform the need for better employee training programs, a key goal of preventive action.

Why it matters

This attribute is key to moving from reactive to proactive quality management by enabling analysis of the fundamental causes of failures.

Where to get

Consult Oracle Quality Management documentation. This is likely a user-defined element in a collection plan, populated after the 'Root Cause Analysis Performed' activity.

Examples
Equipment MalfunctionMaterial DefectHuman ErrorProcedure Not Followed
Severity Level
SeverityLevel
A classification of the quality event's impact, such as critical, major, or minor.
Description

The Severity Level is an assessment, usually made during triage, of the potential impact of the quality issue on customers, compliance, or business operations. This classification helps in prioritizing resources and defining the urgency of the required response.

In process mining, this attribute is crucial for segmentation. Analysts can compare the process flows, cycle times, and outcomes for high-severity events versus low-severity ones. This supports the 'Quality Event Triage Consistency' dashboard and the 'Severity-Based Resolution Rate' KPI by revealing if critical issues are indeed being handled more quickly and effectively.

Why it matters

It allows for prioritization and segmentation of analysis, ensuring that high-impact quality events are managed effectively and efficiently.

Where to get

Consult Oracle Quality Management documentation. This is often a configurable element within a quality collection plan.

Examples
1 - Critical2 - Major3 - Minor4 - Informational
Target Resolution Date
TargetResolutionDate
The planned or expected date for the final closure of the quality event.
Description

This attribute represents the deadline by which a quality event is expected to be fully resolved. It serves as a service level agreement (SLA) or internal target, often determined based on the event's severity or type.

This date is fundamental for performance monitoring and is used directly in calculating the 'CAPA Impl. On-Time Rate' KPI. By comparing the actual completion dates of activities against this target, analysts can measure timeliness, identify events at risk of being late, and track trends in on-time performance. This supports efforts to reduce resolution cycle times.

Why it matters

It provides a benchmark for measuring on-time performance and is essential for calculating timeliness KPIs and managing SLAs.

Where to get

Consult Oracle Quality Management documentation. This may be a standard date field or a user-defined element in the quality collection plan.

Examples
2023-05-302023-06-152024-01-10
Business Unit
BusinessUnit
The business unit or division of the organization where the quality event occurred or is being managed.
Description

This attribute assigns the quality event to a specific part of the business structure. It helps to analyze and compare quality performance across different organizational units.

Segmenting process analysis by Business Unit is a common requirement for large enterprises. It allows for BU-specific dashboards and helps identify if certain divisions have more efficient quality processes or are facing unique challenges. This is valuable for corporate oversight and for sharing best practices across the organization.

Why it matters

It enables performance comparison and analysis across different parts of the organization, supporting enterprise-wide quality management.

Where to get

This is typically part of the organizational context data associated with the transaction, often derived from the user or department's master data.

Examples
Medical DevicesConsumer ElectronicsAutomotive Parts
Closure Code
ClosureCode
A code indicating the reason or outcome of the quality event's closure.
Description

When a quality event is closed, a closure code is often assigned to classify the final outcome. Examples include 'Action Effective', 'No Action Required', or 'Duplicate Issue'.

This attribute is very useful for outcome analysis. By filtering on different closure codes, analysts can study the process paths that lead to successful outcomes versus those that do not. It can help answer questions like, 'What does our process look like for issues that are closed as duplicates?' and identify inefficiencies in the triage process.

Why it matters

It provides crucial information about the outcome of a case, enabling analysis of which process paths lead to successful resolutions.

Where to get

Consult Oracle Quality Management documentation. This would likely be a field populated during the final closure activity.

Examples
EFFECTIVENO_ACTIONDUPLICATERISK_ACCEPTED
Corrective Action Plan ID
CorrectiveActionPlanId
The unique identifier for the corrective action plan (CAPA) created to address the quality event.
Description

This attribute provides a direct link between a quality event and the specific corrective and preventive action plan designed to resolve it. This is often a separate object in the system with its own lifecycle.

In analysis, this ID can be used to join data from the quality event process with data from the CAPA management process, creating a more holistic view. It helps in tracking whether every event that requires a CAPA has one assigned and in analyzing the effectiveness of those actions.

Why it matters

It links the problem (quality event) with the solution (CAPA), enabling a more comprehensive end-to-end analysis of the quality management system.

Where to get

This would be a reference field on the quality event record that points to a record in a CAPA-specific table or module.

Examples
CAPA-2023-088CAPA-2023-091
Is On Time
IsOnTime
A flag indicating whether a corrective action was implemented by its target resolution date.
Description

This boolean attribute is derived by comparing the completion timestamp of the 'Corrective Action Implemented' activity with the 'Target Resolution Date' for the case. It is true if the action was completed on or before the target date, and false otherwise.

This attribute directly supports the 'CAPA Impl. On-Time Rate' KPI. It simplifies analysis and dashboard creation by providing a clear, binary classification for each case's timeliness. It allows for easy filtering and aggregation to monitor adherence to service levels and identify the root causes of delays.

Why it matters

It simplifies the tracking of on-time performance against targets, making it easy to measure and report on this critical KPI.

Where to get

This is a derived flag calculated during data transformation. It requires the TargetResolutionDate and the timestamp of the relevant completion activity.

Examples
truefalse
Is Rework
IsRework
A flag indicating if an activity is a repetition or rework of a previous step in the same case.
Description

This attribute is a boolean flag that is set to true if a specific activity, like 'Corrective Action Plan Proposed', occurs more than once within a single quality event case. This indicates a loop or correction in the process, where a previously completed step had to be redone.

Identifying rework is a key capability of process mining. This flag simplifies the quantification of such inefficiencies and directly supports the 'Activity Rework Frequency' KPI. Analyzing which steps are most prone to rework and under what conditions can uncover issues with training, data quality, or approval criteria, highlighting opportunities to make the process more efficient.

Why it matters

It flags process inefficiencies and loops, helping to quantify waste and identify the root causes of rework.

Where to get

This is calculated using window functions or sequential analysis on the event log during data preparation. It identifies when the same activity name appears multiple times for the same case.

Examples
truefalse
Issue Category
IssueCategory
The category or type of the quality issue, such as 'Product Defect' or 'Process Deviation'.
Description

This attribute provides a classification of the quality event, which helps in grouping similar issues for analysis. The categories are typically defined by the organization to reflect their specific operational context.

Analyzing the process by Issue Category allows for the identification of patterns related to specific types of problems. For example, it might reveal that 'Supplier Material' issues have a much longer cycle time than 'Internal Process' issues. This segmentation is valuable for targeted process improvement initiatives.

Why it matters

Categorizing issues enables targeted analysis to identify trends and root causes for specific problem areas.

Where to get

Consult Oracle Quality Management documentation. This is likely a user-defined element within the quality collection plan.

Examples
Product DefectProcess DeviationSupplier MaterialCustomer Complaint
Last Data Update
LastDataUpdate
The timestamp of the most recent data refresh or update from the source system.
Description

This attribute indicates the last time the data for this event was updated in the process mining dataset. It reflects the freshness of the data and helps users understand the timeliness of the analysis.

In dashboards and reports, this timestamp is critical for providing context to the user. It clarifies whether they are looking at real-time data or a snapshot from a specific point in time, which is essential for making informed operational decisions. It ensures transparency about the data's currency.

Why it matters

This timestamp provides transparency on data freshness, ensuring users understand how current the process analysis is.

Where to get

This value is generated and stored during the data ETL process, typically representing the timestamp when the data pipeline last ran successfully.

Examples
2023-10-27T04:00:00Z2023-10-26T04:00:00Z
Product Identifier
ProductIdentifier
The identifier for the product associated with the quality event.
Description

This attribute links the quality event to a specific product, material, or service. It could be a product code, SKU, or part number.

This link is crucial for product quality analysis. Process mining can be used to compare quality management processes across different product lines or to identify products that are frequently associated with quality issues. This helps in prioritizing engineering or manufacturing improvement efforts where they are needed most.

Why it matters

It connects quality events to specific products, enabling analysis of product-related quality trends and process variations.

Where to get

This information would be stored in a field within the quality collection plan, often linked to the Oracle Inventory item master.

Examples
SKU-100-A-REDPN-987654CHEM-X2
Source System
SourceSystem
Identifies the system of record from which the data was extracted.
Description

This attribute specifies the originating application or system for the event data. In an enterprise environment, quality event data might come from multiple sources, such as the core Oracle Quality module, a separate CAPA system, or a customer complaint portal.

For analysis, this field helps in understanding data lineage and can be used to segment the process based on the system of origin. It is crucial for data governance and for troubleshooting data integration issues, ensuring that the process view accurately reflects the combined data landscape.

Why it matters

It provides crucial context about data origin, which is important for data validation, governance, and analyzing process variations across different systems.

Where to get

This is typically a static value added during the data extraction, transformation, and loading (ETL) process to label the dataset's origin.

Examples
Oracle Quality Management R12Oracle EBS QualityQM-PROD
Total Cycle Time
TotalCycleTime
The total time elapsed from the identification of a quality issue to its final closure.
Description

This attribute measures the full end-to-end duration for a single quality event case. It is calculated as the difference between the timestamp of the very first activity ('Quality Issue Identified') and the very last activity ('Final Review and Closure').

This is a primary key performance indicator (KPI) for the overall efficiency of the quality management process. It is the main metric for the 'Quality Event End-to-End Cycle Time' dashboard. Tracking this metric over time and segmenting it by attributes like Severity or Issue Category provides a high-level view of process health and the impact of improvement initiatives.

Why it matters

This is a critical KPI that measures the overall speed and efficiency of the entire quality management process from start to finish.

Where to get

This is calculated at the case level during data processing for process mining. It requires the start time of the first event and the end time of the last event for each QualityEventId.

Examples
P30DT12HP15DP92D
Required Recommended Optional

Quality Management Activities

These are the key process steps and significant milestones to capture in your event log for accurate process discovery and performance evaluation.
6 Recommended 8 Optional
Activity Description
Corrective Action Plan Approved
Represents the formal approval of the proposed corrective action plan by a designated authority. This is a critical control point, usually captured by an explicit approval action or a status change to 'Approved'.
Why it matters

This approval is a key milestone and a frequent bottleneck. Analyzing approval times helps streamline the process and ensure compliance with procedures.

Where to get

Inferred from a status change on the Quality Action or CAPA record to 'Approved'. Oracle systems with approval workflows often log this change explicitly in audit tables.

Capture

Inferred from a status change to 'Approved'.

Event type inferred
Effectiveness of Action Verified
Confirms that the implemented corrective action has successfully resolved the root cause and prevented recurrence. This is captured when a user completes the verification step and updates the record's status.
Why it matters

This is a critical outcome-based milestone and the basis for the 'Effectiveness Verif. Rate' KPI. It closes the loop on the corrective action cycle, ensuring problems are truly solved.

Where to get

Inferred from a status change on the CAPA record to 'Verification Complete' or 'Effective'. This might also involve populating specific verification result fields.

Capture

Inferred from status change to 'Verification Complete' or 'Effective'.

Event type inferred
Final Review and Closure
The final step where all related actions are confirmed complete and the parent quality issue is formally closed. This is captured by a final status change to 'Closed' or 'Resolved' on the primary record.
Why it matters

This is the primary end event for the process. It is essential for calculating the 'Average Event Cycle Time' KPI and for measuring overall process throughput.

Where to get

Inferred from the final status change on the parent Quality Issue record to 'Closed'. The timestamp of this change serves as the event time.

Capture

Inferred from a status change to 'Closed' on the main Quality Issue record.

Event type inferred
Investigation Initiated
Marks the official start of the investigation phase to determine the root cause of the quality issue. This is usually represented by a status change in the system, such as moving to 'Under Investigation'.
Why it matters

This serves as the starting point for measuring the 'Root Cause Analysis Lead Time' KPI and helps identify how long issues wait before a formal investigation begins.

Where to get

Inferred from a status change on the Quality Issue or an associated Quality Action record to an 'Investigation' status. The timestamp of this status change provides the event time.

Capture

Inferred from a status change to 'Under Investigation' or a similar state.

Event type inferred
Issue Categorized and Prioritized
This activity occurs when an analyst completes the initial assessment, assigning key attributes like severity, priority, and issue type. It is typically captured when the issue transitions from a 'New' status to an 'Assessed' or 'In Triage' status.
Why it matters

This milestone is crucial for the 'Avg Triage Processing Time' KPI. Delays here can slow down the entire resolution process, especially for critical issues.

Where to get

Inferred from a status change on the Quality Issue record, for example, from 'New' to 'Under Assessment', or when fields like 'Severity' or 'Priority' are first populated.

Capture

Inferred from status change or first population of Severity or Priority fields.

Event type inferred
Quality Issue Identified
This activity marks the creation of a new quality event record, such as a non-conformance, deviation, or customer complaint. It is captured explicitly when a user creates a new Quality Issue or Quality Action record in Oracle.
Why it matters

As the start event, it is essential for calculating the total cycle time of the quality management process and for understanding the volume of incoming quality events.

Where to get

This event is captured from the creation timestamp of the Quality Issue or Quality Action record, likely found in tables such as QAM_QUALITY_ISSUES or QAM_QUALITY_ACTIONS.

Capture

Event logged upon creation of a new Quality Issue or Action record.

Event type explicit
Corrective Action Implemented
Marks the completion of the tasks outlined in the approved corrective action plan. This is typically captured when a user updates the status of the corrective action record to 'Implemented' or 'Completed'.
Why it matters

This activity is vital for the 'CAPA Impl. On-Time Rate' KPI, as it signifies that the planned fix has been executed and allows for comparison against target dates.

Where to get

This event is inferred from a status change of the associated Quality Action or CAPA record to 'Implemented' or 'Completed'.

Capture

Inferred from status change to 'Implemented' or 'Completed'.

Event type inferred
Corrective Action Plan Proposed
Occurs when corrective actions are defined and linked to the quality issue, outlining the steps to fix the problem. This can be the creation of a related Corrective Action record or a status change indicating a plan is ready for review.
Why it matters

This tracks the transition from problem analysis to solution design. Rework involving this step, measured by rework KPIs, can indicate unclear requirements or ineffective planning.

Where to get

This could be an explicit event from creating a new Corrective Action record within a CAPA object, or an inferred event from a status change to 'Plan Proposed' or 'Pending Approval'.

Capture

Inferred from a status change to 'Pending Approval' or creation of a linked Corrective Action.

Event type inferred
Effectiveness Check Required
Represents the system or a user flagging that the implemented action requires a follow-up verification to ensure it was effective. This is often an automatic or manual status change that occurs after implementation.
Why it matters

This step initiates the crucial verification phase. Understanding the time between implementation and this activity can highlight delays in initiating necessary follow-ups.

Where to get

This event is inferred from a status change on the Quality Action to 'Pending Effectiveness Check' or a similar state within the workflow.

Capture

Inferred from status change to 'Pending Effectiveness Check'.

Event type inferred
Issue Assigned For Triage
Represents the assignment of the newly created quality issue to a specific user or team for initial review and assessment. This event is often inferred by tracking changes to the assignee or owner field of the quality issue record.
Why it matters

Tracking this initial handoff helps identify delays before assessment begins. Analyzing the time spent in this state reveals potential backlogs in the triage queue.

Where to get

Inferred from changes in the owner or assignee field within the Quality Issue record. This may be sourced from audit trail tables or by tracking status changes associated with assignment workflows.

Capture

Inferred from a change in the 'Assigned To' or 'Owner' field on the Quality Issue.

Event type inferred
Preventive Action Identified
Represents the creation of a preventive action (PA) to address systemic issues and prevent similar quality events from occurring. This is often logged as the creation of a new Preventive Action record linked to the original issue.
Why it matters

This activity shows a mature quality process that moves beyond fixing single issues to preventing future ones. Tracking this helps measure proactive quality improvements.

Where to get

Captured from the creation of a new Quality Action record with a type of 'Preventive Action', often linked to the original Quality Issue or Corrective Action.

Capture

Logged upon creation of a 'Preventive Action' type Quality Action record.

Event type explicit
Preventive Action Implemented
Marks the completion of tasks defined in the preventive action plan to mitigate systemic risks. This is captured when a user updates the status of the preventive action record to 'Implemented' or 'Completed'.
Why it matters

Measures the organization's ability to execute proactive quality improvements. Delays here can indicate a struggle to implement systemic changes across the organization.

Where to get

Inferred from a status change of the associated Preventive Action record to 'Implemented' or 'Completed', similar to how corrective actions are tracked.

Capture

Inferred from status change to 'Implemented' on a Preventive Action record.

Event type inferred
Root Cause Analysis Performed
Represents the completion of the root cause analysis (RCA) and the documentation of findings. This is typically captured when the investigation team updates the quality issue with the identified root cause and changes its status.
Why it matters

This activity is the endpoint for the 'Root Cause Analysis Lead Time' KPI. Analyzing the duration leading to this step helps pinpoint bottlenecks in the problem-solving phase.

Where to get

Inferred from a status change to 'RCA Complete' or when the root cause category field is populated and the record is saved. The timestamp of this update is used.

Capture

Inferred from status change to 'RCA Complete' or population of root cause fields.

Event type inferred
Stakeholders Notified of Resolution
Represents communicating the resolution of the quality event to relevant parties, such as the reporter or affected customers. This is difficult to capture and may be inferred from a post-closure status change or a logged comment.
Why it matters

Crucial for the 'Stakeholder Notification Lag' KPI. Timely communication is important for customer satisfaction and internal transparency, even after an issue is resolved.

Where to get

This is often difficult to capture automatically. It might be inferred from a status like 'Notification Sent' or logged in an activity or comments field, requiring special logic to extract.

Capture

Inferred from a specific status change or potentially text mining of activity logs.

Event type inferred
Recommended Optional

Extraction Guides

How to get your data from Oracle Quality Management