Your Record to Report - Journal Entry Data Template
Your Record to Report - Journal Entry Data Template
- Recommended attributes to collect
- Key activities to track
- Extraction guidance for Oracle Fusion Financials
Record to Report - Journal Entry Attributes
| Name | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Activity
ActivityName
|
The name of the specific business event or task that occurred at a point in time in the journal entry process. | ||
|
Description
The Activity Name describes a single step within the journal entry lifecycle, such as 'Journal Entry Created' or 'Journal Entry Approved'. This data is crucial for building the process map and understanding the sequence of events. Analyzing activities allows for the identification of the process flow, including standard paths, deviations, and rework loops. By tracking different activities, we can measure the time spent in specific stages, such as approval, and identify which steps are most time-consuming or error-prone.
Why it matters
It defines the steps of the process, forming the backbone of the process map and enabling analysis of flow, bottlenecks, and variations.
Where to get
This attribute is typically derived from status changes, event logs, or audit trail tables associated with journal entry objects in the General Ledger module.
Examples
Journal Entry CreatedJournal Submitted For ApprovalJournal Entry ApprovedJournal Entry Posted
|
|||
|
Journal Entry ID
JournalEntryId
|
The unique identifier for a single journal entry, linking all related financial transaction activities. | ||
|
Description
The Journal Entry ID serves as the primary case identifier, uniquely linking all activities related to a specific set of financial transactions. This allows for the tracking of the complete lifecycle of a single journal entry, from initiation to final posting, ensuring all debits and credits are accounted for. In process mining, this ID is essential for reconstructing the end-to-end journey of each journal entry. It connects disparate events like 'Journal Entry Created', 'Journal Submitted For Approval', and 'Journal Entry Posted' into a coherent process flow, enabling analysis of cycle times, bottlenecks, and process variations.
Why it matters
This is the fundamental key for tracking a journal entry from beginning to end, making it possible to analyze the entire process flow for each unique case.
Where to get
This is a primary key found in core General Ledger tables such as GL_JE_HEADERS and GL_JE_LINES.
Examples
JE100523JE202311001882019
|
|||
|
Start Time
EventTime
|
The timestamp indicating when a specific activity or event occurred. | ||
|
Description
This timestamp marks the exact date and time that an activity was executed. It is the primary temporal element used in process mining to determine the sequence of events and calculate durations between them. The accuracy of the Event Time is critical for all time-based analyses, including calculating cycle times, identifying bottlenecks, and monitoring performance against service level agreements. It provides the chronological order needed to reconstruct the process flow as it happened.
Why it matters
This timestamp is essential for ordering events, calculating all process durations, and performing any time-based analysis.
Where to get
This information is typically stored in audit trail tables or as a 'Last Update Date' or 'Creation Date' on transaction tables like GL_JE_HEADERS and GL_JE_LINES for specific events.
Examples
2023-10-26T10:00:00Z2023-11-15T14:35:10Z2024-01-05T09:12:00Z
|
|||
|
Last Data Update
LastDataUpdate
|
The timestamp of the most recent data refresh or extraction from the source system. | ||
|
Description
This attribute records when the dataset was last updated. It provides context about the freshness of the data being analyzed, which is important for understanding the relevance of the insights derived. In any analysis, especially in operational dashboards, knowing the Last Data Update time is critical for users to trust the data and make informed decisions. It clearly communicates the cutoff point for the data included in the process mining model.
Why it matters
Indicates the freshness of the data, ensuring users understand how current the process analysis is and can trust the insights.
Where to get
This value is generated and stored during the data extraction and transformation process. It is typically the timestamp when the ETL/ELT job was completed.
Examples
2023-11-20T08:00:00Z2023-11-21T08:00:00Z2023-11-22T08:00:00Z
|
|||
|
Source System
SourceSystem
|
The system or module where the data originated. | ||
|
Description
This attribute identifies the source system from which the process data was extracted. In a complex IT landscape, data may come from multiple integrated systems, and this field helps differentiate them. In process analysis, knowing the source system is crucial for understanding process variations that may be driven by different system behaviors. It also helps in data validation and troubleshooting by tracing data back to its origin.
Why it matters
Identifies the origin of the data, which is crucial for data governance, validation, and understanding process variations across different systems.
Where to get
This is often a static value configured during data extraction, or it could be a field in the source tables identifying the system of entry.
Examples
Oracle Fusion Financials CloudOracle EBS R12Fusion GL
|
|||
|
Journal Amount
JournalAmount
|
The total monetary value of the journal entry, typically the sum of debits. | ||
|
Description
This attribute represents the total financial value being transacted in the journal entry. The amount can be a significant factor influencing the process. For example, high-value entries might require additional approval steps or more thorough reviews. Analyzing Journal Amount allows for the segmentation of cases by financial impact. It helps answer questions like 'Do high-value entries take longer to approve?' or 'Are rejections more common for entries above a certain threshold?'. This provides crucial business context to the process flow.
Why it matters
Provides critical business context, allowing analysis based on financial impact and helping to identify if high-value entries follow a different process.
Where to get
This value is typically calculated as the sum of debits or credits from the GL_JE_LINES table for a given journal entry.
Examples
5000.00125000.75750.50
|
|||
|
Journal Category
JournalCategory
|
The category of the journal entry, such as 'Accrual', 'Adjustment', or 'Reclassification'. | ||
|
Description
Journal Category classifies entries based on their business purpose. This classification allows for more granular analysis of the process, as different categories may have distinct process flows, approval rules, or cycle times. For example, month-end adjustment journals might have a more complex and urgent process than routine accruals. Analyzing the process by category helps to uncover these variations and tailor improvements to specific types of journal entries.
Why it matters
Allows for segmenting the process by the business purpose of the journal, revealing different behaviors and performance for different entry types.
Where to get
Available in the GL_JE_HEADERS table, typically in a field named JE_CATEGORY.
Examples
AccrualManualAdjustmentRevaluation
|
|||
|
Journal Source
JournalSource
|
The subledger or source that generated the journal entry, such as 'Payables', 'Receivables', or 'Manual'. | ||
|
Description
This attribute indicates the origin of the journal entry within the ERP system. Entries can be created manually in the General Ledger or generated automatically from subledgers like Accounts Payable, Accounts Receivable, or Fixed Assets. Journal Source is a key attribute for automation analysis. It helps differentiate between manual and system-generated entries, supporting the 'Automated Journal Entry Rate' KPI. Processes for entries from different sources often vary significantly in terms of complexity and efficiency.
Why it matters
Distinguishes between manual and automated entries, which is critical for measuring automation rates and analyzing process differences.
Where to get
Available in the GL_JE_HEADERS table, typically in a field named JE_SOURCE.
Examples
ManualPayablesAssetsReceivables
|
|||
|
Rejection Reason
RejectionReason
|
A textual description or code explaining why a journal entry was rejected. | ||
|
Description
When a journal entry is rejected during the approval process, this attribute captures the reason for the rejection. This could be a predefined code or a free-text comment from the approver. This is one of the most important attributes for root cause analysis of process inefficiencies. By analyzing the most common rejection reasons, organizations can identify areas for improvement, such as better training for preparers, clearer guidelines, or system control enhancements. It directly supports the 'Journal Entry Rejection Rate Analysis' dashboard.
Why it matters
Provides direct insight into the root causes of rework and process delays, enabling targeted improvements to reduce rejection rates.
Where to get
This information may be stored in workflow or audit trail tables associated with the approval process, or in a notes field on the journal header.
Examples
Incorrect Account CombinationInsufficient Supporting DocumentationExceeds budget
|
|||
|
User
UserName
|
The user who performed the activity, such as creating, approving, or posting the journal entry. | ||
|
Description
This attribute identifies the specific employee or system user responsible for executing an activity. It is crucial for understanding workload distribution, performance, and identifying individual bottlenecks. In analysis, UserName allows for filtering processes by user, comparing user efficiency, and investigating reasons for delays or errors. It directly supports dashboards like 'User Workload & Efficiency Across Teams' and KPIs like the 'User Journal Bottleneck Index'.
Why it matters
Attributes responsibility for process steps, enabling analysis of user workload, individual performance, and training needs.
Where to get
Found in transaction tables like GL_JE_HEADERS (e.g., CREATED_BY, LAST_UPDATED_BY) and related audit trail tables.
Examples
john.doesusan.smithautoprocess_user
|
|||
|
User Department
UserDepartment
|
The department or team to which the user who performed the activity belongs. | ||
|
Description
This attribute provides organizational context by linking an activity to a specific department, such as 'Finance', 'Accounting Operations', or 'Internal Audit'. It is typically derived from user master data. Analyzing by User Department helps identify cross-departmental bottlenecks, compare team performance, and understand how process execution differs across the organization. It is valuable for resource allocation and targeted process improvement initiatives.
Why it matters
Provides organizational context, allowing for performance analysis by team or department and highlighting cross-functional inefficiencies.
Where to get
This is typically not in the transaction tables. It must be sourced by joining the UserName with a user master data table or HR system data.
Examples
General AccountingFinancial ReportingAccounts Payable
|
|||
|
Accounting Period
AccountingPeriod
|
The fiscal period to which the journal entry is posted, such as 'Jan-24'. | ||
|
Description
The Accounting Period specifies the financial period in which the transaction is recognized. This is fundamental for all financial reporting and analysis. In process mining, this attribute is crucial for trend analysis. It allows for comparing process performance, such as cycle times or rejection rates, across different months or quarters. This helps in identifying seasonality effects, like increased workload during month-end close, and measuring the impact of process improvements over time.
Why it matters
Enables trend analysis of KPIs over time, helping to measure process improvement and identify seasonal patterns like month-end pressures.
Where to get
Available in the GL_JE_HEADERS table, typically in a field named PERIOD_NAME.
Examples
Jan-24Feb-24Mar-24
|
|||
|
Currency
CurrencyCode
|
The currency code for the journal entry amount, such as USD, EUR, or GBP. | ||
|
Description
The Currency Code specifies the currency of the financial amounts in the journal entry. This is essential for multinational organizations that transact in multiple currencies. This attribute ensures that financial values are interpreted correctly. It allows for filtering by currency and is a necessary field when performing any analysis that involves comparing or aggregating monetary amounts across different regions.
Why it matters
Provides necessary context for any financial amounts, ensuring accurate interpretation and enabling analysis specific to different currencies.
Where to get
Available in the GL_JE_HEADERS table, typically in a field named CURRENCY_CODE.
Examples
USDEURGBPJPY
|
|||
|
End Time
EndTime
|
The timestamp indicating when a specific activity was completed. | ||
|
Description
The End Time marks the completion of an activity. While Start Time logs the beginning, End Time provides the closing point, allowing for precise calculation of the processing time for that specific step. This is essential for calculating activity processing times, which is a core metric for identifying bottlenecks and measuring resource efficiency. For example, the difference between the End Time and Start Time of the 'Journal Entry Reviewed' activity gives the actual time a reviewer spent on the task.
Why it matters
It enables the calculation of the actual duration or processing time of individual activities, which is key to identifying efficiency issues.
Where to get
Similar to Start Time, this is often found in audit trail tables or can be inferred from the Start Time of the subsequent activity in the process.
Examples
2023-10-26T10:15:00Z2023-11-15T14:55:10Z2024-01-05T09:22:00Z
|
|||
|
End-to-End Cycle Time
EndToEndCycleTime
|
The total calculated duration from the creation of a journal entry to its final reconciliation. | ||
|
Description
This metric represents the total time a journal entry spends in the entire process, from the very first 'Journal Entry Created' event to the final 'Journal Entry Reconciled' event. It provides a holistic view of process performance. This is a primary KPI for measuring overall process efficiency. It is used in trend dashboards to track the impact of improvement initiatives over time and provides a baseline against which all process changes can be measured.
Why it matters
Provides a high-level measure of the entire process's health and efficiency, making it a key metric for executive reporting.
Where to get
This metric is calculated by the process mining platform as the time difference between the first and last event timestamps for each case.
Examples
P10DT5HP4DT12HP22D
|
|||
|
Is On-Time Posting
IsOnTimePosting
|
A calculated flag that is true if the journal was posted on or before its target date. | ||
|
Description
This boolean attribute is derived by comparing the timestamp of the 'Journal Entry Posted' activity with the 'Target Posting Date'. If the posting occurs on or before the target, the value is 'true'; otherwise, it is 'false'. This attribute directly supports the 'On-Time Journal Posting Rate' KPI by simplifying the calculation. It allows for easy filtering and analysis of late entries to identify common causes for delays, such as specific journal categories or approvers.
Why it matters
Provides a clear, binary outcome for posting performance, simplifying the analysis of on-time rates and the root causes of delays.
Where to get
This attribute is calculated by the process mining tool. It requires the 'TargetPostingDate' attribute and the timestamp of the 'Journal Entry Posted' activity.
Examples
truefalse
|
|||
|
Is Rework
IsRework
|
A calculated flag that is true if the journal entry has undergone a rejection and correction cycle. | ||
|
Description
This boolean attribute is calculated to identify cases that have experienced rework. It is typically flagged as 'true' for any activity that follows a 'Journal Entry Rejected' event, such as 'Journal Corrected and Resubmitted'. Is Rework is a powerful attribute for analysis, as it allows for easy quantification of the volume and impact of rework loops. It directly supports the 'Average Journal Rework Rate' KPI and helps in comparing the process flow and duration of reworked cases versus those that are processed correctly the first time.
Why it matters
Directly flags cases that have gone through inefficient rework loops, making it easy to quantify the frequency and impact of process failures.
Where to get
This is not available in the source system. It is calculated within the process mining tool by analyzing the sequence of activities for each case.
Examples
truefalse
|
|||
|
Journal Approval Time
JournalApprovalTime
|
The calculated duration between journal submission and the final approval or rejection decision. | ||
|
Description
This metric measures the time elapsed from when a journal is submitted for approval until it is either approved or rejected. It is a critical measure of the efficiency of the approval workflow. Journal Approval Time is a direct input for the 'Average Journal Approval Time' KPI and the 'Journal Entry Approval Bottlenecks' dashboard. Analyzing this duration helps pinpoint delays in the approval chain, whether they are caused by specific approvers, departments, or journal types.
Why it matters
Directly measures the efficiency of the approval workflow, which is often a major source of process delays.
Where to get
This is a calculated metric within the process mining tool. It is the time difference between the 'Journal Submitted For Approval' and 'Journal Entry Approved' or 'Journal Entry Rejected' events.
Examples
P2DT4H30MPT8HP5D
|
|||
|
Ledger Name
LedgerName
|
The name of the general ledger where the journal entry is recorded. | ||
|
Description
The Ledger Name identifies the specific ledger to which the journal entry belongs. In organizations with multiple legal entities or reporting requirements, there can be multiple ledgers, such as a primary ledger for corporate accounting and secondary ledgers for local statutory reporting. This attribute is essential for filtering and comparing processes across different legal entities or business units. It ensures that analyses are conducted within the correct organizational context, which is particularly important for financial compliance and reporting.
Why it matters
Enables process analysis to be filtered and compared across different legal entities or accounting frameworks, which is vital for large organizations.
Where to get
Found in the GL_JE_HEADERS table, typically linked via a LEDGER_ID which can be joined with GL_LEDGERS to get the name.
Examples
US Primary LedgerUK Statutory LedgerGlobal Consolidation Ledger
|
|||
|
Posting Status
PostingStatus
|
The current posting status of the journal entry, for example, 'Unposted' or 'Posted'. | ||
|
Description
This attribute reflects the current state of the journal entry with respect to its posting in the general ledger. It is a key indicator of where a journal entry is in its lifecycle, especially for in-flight cases. Posting Status is crucial for the 'Real-Time Journal Entry Status Tracker' dashboard, providing a snapshot of all active entries. It helps in monitoring backlogs of unposted journals and identifying delays in the final stages of the process.
Why it matters
Indicates the current state of a journal, which is essential for monitoring backlogs and tracking the status of in-progress entries.
Where to get
Available in the GL_JE_HEADERS table, typically in a column like STATUS or POSTING_STATUS.
Examples
PostedUnpostedError
|
|||
|
Reversal Indicator
ReversalIndicator
|
A flag that indicates if the journal entry is a reversal of another entry. | ||
|
Description
This boolean attribute identifies journal entries that are created to reverse a previously posted entry. Reversals are a specific type of journal entry that often follow a distinct, and sometimes problematic, process. Analyzing this indicator is key to supporting the 'Journal Reversal Process Performance' dashboard. It allows for isolating reversal processes to measure their frequency, causes, and cycle times, helping to identify underlying issues in the original entries that necessitate reversal.
Why it matters
Helps isolate and analyze the reversal process, which is often an indicator of errors or issues in the original transaction.
Where to get
This can be a specific flag on the GL_JE_HEADERS table, such as ACCRUAL_REV_FLAG, or identified through links to the original journal being reversed.
Examples
truefalse
|
|||
|
Target Posting Date
TargetPostingDate
|
The predetermined date by which the journal entry is expected to be posted. | ||
|
Description
The Target Posting Date represents the deadline for posting a journal entry to the general ledger, often determined by service level agreements (SLAs) or month-end close schedules. It serves as a benchmark for measuring performance. This attribute is essential for calculating the 'On-Time Journal Posting Rate' KPI. By comparing the actual posting date to this target, the system can automatically flag entries as on-time or late, providing a clear measure of process adherence to schedules.
Why it matters
Defines the service level agreement or deadline for posting, enabling the calculation of on-time performance KPIs.
Where to get
This may not be a standard field. It might be derived from business rules based on the creation date, accounting period, or journal category.
Examples
2023-10-312023-11-302024-01-05
|
|||
Record to Report - Journal Entry Activities
| Activity | Description | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Journal Entry Approved
|
The designated approver has formally approved the journal entry, confirming its accuracy and validity. This is the final step in the approval workflow, clearing the way for posting. | ||
|
Why it matters
This milestone marks the end of the approval process. The time between submission and approval is a key KPI for measuring workflow efficiency and identifying approval bottlenecks.
Where to get
This event is inferred from a status change in the GL_JE_HEADERS table, where the APPROVAL_STATUS_CODE is updated to 'APPROVED'. Workflow tables contain the approver's identity and timestamp.
Capture
Track the timestamp when APPROVAL_STATUS_CODE in GL_JE_HEADERS changes to 'APPROVED'.
Event type
inferred
|
|||
|
Journal Entry Created
|
This activity marks the initiation of the journal entry process. It represents the moment a user creates a new journal header and begins entering data, but before it is submitted for any review or approval. | ||
|
Why it matters
This is the primary start event for the process. Analyzing the time from this activity to subsequent steps helps measure initial data entry efficiency and overall process cycle time.
Where to get
This event is typically inferred from the creation date timestamp in the GL_JE_HEADERS table for a specific Journal Entry ID. The user who created the record is also available in this table.
Capture
Use the CREATION_DATE from the GL_JE_HEADERS table.
Event type
inferred
|
|||
|
Journal Entry Posted
|
The journal entry's financial data has been successfully recorded in the General Ledger. The debits and credits are now reflected in the account balances. | ||
|
Why it matters
This is a critical milestone representing the journal's entry into the official financial record. It is essential for measuring the on-time posting rate and the total time from creation to posting.
Where to get
This is inferred from a status change in the GL_JE_HEADERS table, where the STATUS field changes to 'P' (Posted). The GL_JE_BATCHES table also has a posting status.
Capture
Track the timestamp when STATUS in GL_JE_HEADERS changes to 'P'.
Event type
inferred
|
|||
|
Journal Entry Reconciled
|
The journal entry has been matched and cleared during a period-end account reconciliation process. This confirms that the transaction aligns with other financial data, such as bank statements. | ||
|
Why it matters
This activity serves as a true end-point for the journal's lifecycle. Measuring the time from posting to reconciliation is a key KPI for assessing the efficiency of the financial close process.
Where to get
This event is typically captured in the Oracle Financial Consolidation and Close Cloud Service (FCCS) or Account Reconciliation Cloud Service (ARCS), not the General Ledger itself. It's inferred from a status change on the reconciliation record linked to the journal.
Capture
Correlate journal data with reconciliation status updates from ARCS or FCCS tables.
Event type
inferred
|
|||
|
Journal Submitted For Approval
|
This activity occurs when the user formally submits the completed journal entry into the approval workflow. It transitions the journal from a draft or incomplete state to pending approval. | ||
|
Why it matters
This is a critical milestone that starts the clock for measuring approval cycle times and identifying bottlenecks. It separates the data entry phase from the review and approval phase.
Where to get
This event is inferred from a status change in the GL_JE_HEADERS table, specifically when the APPROVAL_STATUS_CODE changes to a value like 'REQUIRED' or 'INITIATED'. The submission date timestamp may also be recorded.
Capture
Track the timestamp when APPROVAL_STATUS_CODE in GL_JE_HEADERS changes to indicate submission.
Event type
inferred
|
|||
|
Journal Corrected and Resubmitted
|
After a journal entry is rejected, the creator makes the necessary corrections and resubmits it for approval. This activity represents the start of a new approval cycle for the same journal. | ||
|
Why it matters
Tracking rework is essential for understanding process inefficiency. This activity, combined with 'Journal Entry Rejected', allows for the measurement of rework time and frequency.
Where to get
This is a subsequent 'Journal Submitted For Approval' event for a journal that was previously in a 'REJECTED' state. It is identified by analyzing the sequence of status changes for a single Journal Entry ID.
Capture
Identify a submission event timestamp that occurs after a rejection event for the same case ID.
Event type
inferred
|
|||
|
Journal Entry Rejected
|
An approver has reviewed the journal entry and rejected it due to errors, lack of documentation, or policy violations. This action sends the journal back to the creator for correction. | ||
|
Why it matters
This activity is crucial for analyzing rework loops, rejection rates, and first-time-right metrics. High frequency of rejections points to issues with data quality or training.
Where to get
This is inferred from a status change in the GL_JE_HEADERS table when the APPROVAL_STATUS_CODE is updated to 'REJECTED'. The workflow history will log the user and timestamp for this action.
Capture
Track the timestamp when APPROVAL_STATUS_CODE in GL_JE_HEADERS is set to 'REJECTED'.
Event type
inferred
|
|||
|
Journal Entry Reviewed
|
A review step that may occur before or as part of the formal approval process. This represents a check by a peer or manager to ensure accuracy and compliance before it moves to the final approver. | ||
|
Why it matters
Isolating this activity helps to differentiate between preliminary review times and final approval times. It can reveal hidden bottlenecks if the review stage is informal but time consuming.
Where to get
This may be an explicit step in a multi-stage approval workflow, captured in workflow history tables. If informal, it is not captured. It can be inferred if a specific user action is logged before the final approval decision.
Capture
Analyze workflow history tables for interim approval or review steps before the final 'Approved' status.
Event type
inferred
|
|||
|
Journal Posting Initiated
|
The process of posting the approved journal to the General Ledger has been started. This can be an automated or manual step that queues the journal for processing by the posting program. | ||
|
Why it matters
This activity separates the approval from the technical posting process. Delays between approval and posting initiation can indicate scheduling issues or resource constraints in the posting engine.
Where to get
This can be inferred from status changes in the GL_JE_BATCHES table, or by the submission time of the posting concurrent request associated with the journal batch.
Capture
Identify the request submission time for the General Ledger Posting program for the specific journal batch.
Event type
inferred
|
|||
|
Journal Reversal Processed
|
A reversing journal entry has been created and posted to negate the financial impact of the original journal in a subsequent period. This is a common action for accruals. | ||
|
Why it matters
Tracking reversals helps identify types of entries that are frequently reversed and analyze the efficiency of the reversal process itself. This can indicate issues with accrual management.
Where to get
This is inferred by identifying a new journal entry that is explicitly linked to the original as its reversal. The GL_JE_HEADERS table has fields like REVERSAL_PERIOD and REVERSAL_FLAG to identify and link these entries.
Capture
Identify the creation and posting date of the new journal whose header references the original journal as being reversed.
Event type
inferred
|
|||
|
Posting Verified
|
A post-posting verification step where a user or system confirms that the journal was posted correctly and balances are as expected. This is often a manual control step. | ||
|
Why it matters
Analyzing this activity helps understand the time spent on manual controls and quality assurance after posting. It can highlight opportunities for automating verification processes.
Where to get
This is unlikely to be an explicit event in Oracle Fusion. It would need to be inferred from other actions, such as a user running a specific report or a custom status field being updated, which is not standard.
Capture
Requires custom logic, such as tracking the run time of verification reports or updates to a descriptive flexfield.
Event type
inferred
|
|||
|
Supporting Documentation Attached
|
Represents the action of attaching supporting documents, such as invoices or spreadsheets, to the journal entry. This is often done to provide context and evidence for auditors and approvers. | ||
|
Why it matters
Tracking this activity helps understand if delays are caused by missing documentation. It also provides insights into compliance and the completeness of journal entries before they enter the approval workflow.
Where to get
This can be difficult to track as a discrete event. It might be inferred from timestamps in attachment tables like FND_ATTACHED_DOCUMENTS, linked to the journal entry record in GL_JE_HEADERS.
Capture
Infer from the creation date of records in FND_ATTACHED_DOCUMENTS linked to the journal.
Event type
inferred
|
|||